One body paragraph

  One reason that mobile technology should be allowed for students to be used in classroom is that it helps students have more knowledge than using books or notebooks. First of all, mobile technology helps students have many useful resources; for example, if students need to take the information to develop topics that they need to do in the class, and the modern equipment is needed for students because it responds quickly and exactly about the date or the amount of information that students need than the old knowledge in the books. Thus, the students will learn better and have more skills and new knowledge in the lessons. Also, mobile technology is very convenient for students to take note because they can type very fast to save all the knowledge the teacher gives for them. Lorraine D, Jackson had a survey with students about the use of mobile technology in the classroom, and they said that using mobile technology to help them organize notes and easily manage the information.(2013). If students use the paper to write, they will be very difficult to find the information through huge stacks of paper; therefore, mobile technology has advantages to take notes than papers, and students won't lose them because they are stored on the device technology. Finally, using mobile technology helps students break the traditional study style . The support of technology in the classroom, the teacher becomes the guide, and students can actively learning and independent study. Thus the dynamism and interactive ability between teachers and students will be increased, and students will be remember long time the knowledge that they research and find out. In conclusion, the advantages of that students use modern mobile technology in the classroom is very helpful because the students get the latest update on the resources as quickly as possible, also students stored the knowledge a organized way, and they will be more responsible in learning , so the knowledge will be remembered longer by students.
 

Annotated Bibliography-2

       In "Smartphones in the Classroom? Let Students Decide", Gooblar states whether the students should be allowed to use personal technology in the classroom or not. The author discusses that using smartphone will distract students , and it is very difficult to communicate with the students; however, it helps them data management and exchange information easier. The authors offers a solution that is a conversation of students to come up with a decision and the students will have responsibility with their decision.
  This article is up date on January 23, 2014, and it was only two years ago. Also, the writer David Gooblar is a literature and writing teacher at Mount Mercy University and Augustana College, so I trust him; even though I can't check it. Based on his opinion and this article was born, so he did not have any sources. To sum up, this article the author wants to send to the other professors should give their opinion to everyone.

 Reference: David Gooblar (Jan,23,2014) " Smartphones in the Classroom? Let Students Decide", The Chronicle Of Higher Education , August,19,2016.

Annotated Bibliography-2

           In "Smartphones in the Classroom? Let Students Decide", Gooblar states whether the students should be allowed to use personal technology in the classroom or not. The author discusses that using smartphone will distract students , and it is very difficult to communicate with the students; however, it helps them data management and exchange information easier. The authors offers a solution that is a conversation of students to come up with a decision and the students will have responsibility with their decision.
 This article is up date on January 23, 2014, and it was only two years ago. Also, the writer David Gooblar is a literature and writing teacher at Mount Mercy University and Augustana College, so I trust him; even though I can't check it. Based on his opinion and this article was born, so he did not have any sources. To sum up, this article the author wants to send to the other professors should give their opinion to everyone.

 Reference: David Gooblar (Jan,23,2014) " Smartphones in the Classroom? Let Students Decide", The Chronicle Of Higher Education , August,19,2016.

Annotated Bibliography

       In the article" Fair Play," the author Sheryl Bergmann Drewe discusses the issues of fraud in sports competitions of athletes. The athletes take performance enhance drugs (PEDs) to high achievement in the game, but they do not prove the talent of athletes. The ban on PEDs in sports to clean competitions, healthy and fair. The author claims that using PEDs will have negatives for athletes. First of all, taking PEDs affecs to the health. Second, using PEDs affects supporters. Last, PEDs affects ethics of athletes use them. Drewe states that for sports competitions are fair, the athletes can use PEDs in the sports because they would keep competitions equal with ability and ethical of athletes.
This article does not have the date of publication; however it has a very high level of trust to the reader because the author is a professor in the University of Manitoba, and it is the publisher chooses to include in lessons of 600 levels. Also, this article get information from Fair Play Sports, Values and Society ( R.Smimon). To sum up, in this article the author wants to send to the athletes about the influence when using PEDs.
        From this article I think PEDs should be banned in all cases in the sport, and athletes will bring beauty and fairness for sports.

Reference:  Drewe, Sheryl, Fair Play
                   Jose Canseco Mar/17/2005  Should Performance Enhancing Drugs( Such as Steroids) Be Accepted in Sports? Procon.org  August/ 8/ 2016, August/16/2016 http://sportsanddrugs.procon.org/

Travel To be polite abroad, you ate WHAT?

       In the article "Travel To be polite abroad, you ate WHAT? " by Gary Stoller is about how to deal  with strange food when people go to other countries, and the author states that people should not refuse bizarre food because it shows polite behavior of people with other people. There are three supporting idea for the author. First, in each countries they always have unique foods, so people will have the opportunity to enjoy some bizarre food if people go to other countries. Sometimes people do not want to eating bizarre foods; however, people should try at least one time because it can change their mind, that means people can like it, and also that represents polite behavior with others, who take their time to cook for people. Second, Lee (2013) asserts, "If you don't want to be adventurous, you can simply fib and say you're allergic to whatever is being served"(Stoller, para13), that is a reason white lie if people can not eating bizarre foods , and they will feel comfortable with other people , it means people still respect each other without impolite. Finally, there are many excuse can be use if people don't want to eating a bizarre food. The author discuses some example, such as " I have allergic with strange food, I am a vegetarian or my doctor has me on a strict diet...". So, people can avoid eating bizarre foods that still expressing polite to others. To sum up, trying a bizarre food is polite with other people, and also having a good experience about a new food. If people like the food, they can enjoy more, but if they don't like, they can refuse a polite way.